One of the most underrated and misunderstood challenges is this:
How do you organize your data in a way that actually makes sense to your business?
Organizing manufacturing process data is harder than expected, especially when trying to use a single hierarchy.
β
Different functions needed different views:
β¨ Maintenance teams want to see asset types across sites.
β¨ Process engineers care about production lines.
β¨ Environmental, quality, inventory teams all have their own lenses.
One tank could belong in 10 different contexts. A single, rigid hierarchy couldnβt meet all needs.
Instead of βone hierarchy to rule them all,β you could build multiple hierarchies, grounded in ISA-88 and ISA-95 standards.
Each supported a different business function or analytical use case.
β
β
β¨ Define the business problems and analytics needs first.
β¨ Build flexible, layered hierarchies using a platform of your choice.
β¨ Allow assets and tags to be referenced in multiple contexts.
The result is that every use case fits into an existing structure without major rework needed.
It may take long, but it enables scale, clarity, and speed later.
β
Industrial data &Β AI Β architecture guides, implementation tutorials and use-case blueprints, delivered as theyβre published.

