November 11, 2025
November 11, 2025

Many engineers struggle to fully leverage MQTT for building connected solutions. This guide breaks down exactly how to use MQTT to build robust, scalable connected systems. We'll explore key MQTT principles that enable scalable and resilient architectures, examining why the publish-subscribe model outperforms traditional request-response approaches for industrial IoT applications.
Understanding MQTT architecture is essential for engineers and architects designing connected systems that must scale from dozens to millions of devices while maintaining reliability and performance.
To effectively build connected solutions using MQTT, you must first understand its communication architecture. MQTT uses a publish-subscribe mechanism for exchanging information. The best way to explain how this works is examining how it differs from traditional connection methods like HTTP.
In HTTP communication, there are two main participants: a client and a server. These two connect directly. When the client needs information, it sends a request to the server, which replies with a corresponding response.
This exchange happens synchronously—the client waits for the server's reply before proceeding. The tight coupling between client and server creates limitations for large-scale industrial deployments.
In contrast, MQTT does not involve direct connections between participants. Instead, a third component is introduced into the network that acts as a server. Its role is coordinating message exchange between participants, both of which function as clients.
In MQTT, the client serving as the information source pushes data to a server known as the MQTT broker. The broker then coordinates distribution of data to any client that needs it.
This decoupling allows adding more participants to your network, where each participating client can both send and receive information through the central MQTT broker.
It might seem unnecessary to introduce a middleman between communicating entities. However, this approach becomes clearly beneficial when considering the flexibility, efficiency, and scalability required for message exchange among hundreds, thousands, or even millions of participants in enterprise applications.
Imagine you have a predictive analytics application directly connected to assets like an assembly robot, compressor, and automated guided vehicle on the factory floor. Using HTTP's request-response model, the application needs to continuously send message requests at a specified frequency—say, every second—to achieve near real-time reporting of events and up-to-date asset status.
If you have 1,000 such devices, you'd be sending requests 1,000 times every second.
This approach has significant drawbacks:
Escalating Computational Costs: Costs increase quickly as you raise update frequency or add more devices to your network
Increased Network Load: Constant polling creates sustained high network traffic even when nothing changes
Resource Inefficiency: Systems must allocate resources continuously regardless of whether events occur
What MQTT does by introducing a broker between connected devices and your application is allow clients to publish information to the broker only when they deem it necessary or when an event occurs.
Because the application has already notified the broker about information it's interested in (subscribed to), the broker will relay that information to the application.
The MQTT publish-subscribe approach provides an architectural framework for building event-driven solutions where applications and devices respond to events as they occur, making it ideal for reactive applications requiring real-time processing.
By reacting only when changes occur, systems are more efficient in resource usage compared to polling mechanisms that require constant resource allocation. Subscribers only receive relevant data, reducing network load and processing demands.
Unlike the request-response model in HTTP where both client and server must be online and available simultaneously to exchange information, MQTT's publish-subscribe model operates differently.
Suppose your predictive analytics application experiences a failure. The asynchronous nature of MQTT's publish-subscribe mechanism allows the system to keep functioning by queuing messages from devices in the broker. These messages will be processed once the application service is restored.
This resilience is critical for industrial environments where network interruptions and system maintenance are inevitable.
Suppose you decide to introduce another application, such as one for energy efficiency. Using the request-response approach, you'd need to create a new set of direct connections to devices on the factory floor. If you require information from yet another source for context, you'd establish another direct API connection.
This begins creating a complex network of tightly coupled connections where applications depend on SDK or API configurations of specific devices and applications they're connected to. This complexity increases exponentially as you add more participants to your network, making it difficult to manage and scale your solution.
By introducing an MQTT broker to coordinate communication between clients, you effectively decouple components and eliminate one-to-one relationships between devices and applications, replacing them with one-to-many and many-to-many relationships.
This allows creating a decoupled communication network where:
Publishers and Subscribers Operate Independently: They don't need to know anything about each other's implementation details
Changes Are Isolated: Changes to one component don't affect the entire system, providing flexibility and scalability
Independent Scaling: Components can be scaled, updated, replaced, or added without necessitating changes or downtime in other parts of the system
You can continue adding clients up to tens of millions of connections.
As you increase MQTT clients to large scales, the volume of messages and number of concurrent connections also increases. This poses the risk of sacrificing performance or reliability of the central component—the MQTT broker.
To address this issue, MQTT's publish-subscribe architecture allows increasing system capacity by adding more message broker instances to handle increased load without needing to modify the architecture or other services.
This horizontal scalability is critical for supporting dynamic workloads typical in:
One common approach to achieve horizontal scalability in MQTT is through broker clustering. A cluster consists of multiple MQTT brokers working together as a single logical broker.
This setup can handle more connections and messages than a single broker. The brokers in a cluster share the workload and, in some configurations, can also provide high availability and failover capabilities.
Benefits of broker clustering:
Load Distribution: Messages and connections distribute across multiple broker instances
High Availability: If one broker fails, others continue serving clients
Fault Tolerance: Automatic failover ensures continuous service
Performance: Parallel processing of messages improves throughput
MQTT communication involves three components:
Publishers: Send messages to the broker
Subscribers: Receive messages from the broker
Broker: Central server managing message distribution
An MQTT client can function as both a publisher and a subscriber, enabling bidirectional communication patterns.
To help the broker determine which recipients should receive specific messages, publishers include string identifiers (topics) that categorize the data. Subscribers express interest in specific topics, and the broker routes messages accordingly.
Publishers and subscribers don't need to know each other's network locations, IP addresses, or connection details. They only need to know the broker's address.
Publishers and subscribers don't need to be online simultaneously. The broker can queue messages for offline subscribers, delivering them when connections restore.
Publishers continue operations without blocking to wait for subscribers to process messages. This asynchronous operation improves system responsiveness and throughput.
When designing connected systems with MQTT:
Start with Clear Requirements: Define message volumes, latency requirements, and reliability needs
Design Topic Hierarchies Carefully: Create logical, scalable topic structures that grow with your system
Plan for Scale: Consider broker clustering from the start if you anticipate growth
Implement Proper QoS Levels: Choose appropriate quality of service for different message types
Monitor Broker Performance: Track connection counts, message rates, and resource utilization
Test Failure Scenarios: Verify behavior when publishers, subscribers, or brokers go offline
MQTT's publish-subscribe architecture provides a powerful foundation for building scalable, resilient connected systems. By decoupling publishers and subscribers through a central broker, MQTT enables event-driven architectures that are more efficient than traditional polling-based approaches.
The ability to scale horizontally through broker clustering ensures systems can grow from dozens to millions of devices without architectural changes. Asynchronous communication patterns provide resilience against failures, while the decoupled design allows independent evolution of system components.
Understanding these architectural principles enables engineers to leverage MQTT effectively, building connected solutions that meet the demanding requiremen